CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, APPELLANT,
v.
IRA WAYNE BRAMLITT, SR., ET AL., APPELLEE
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, APPELLANT,
IRA WAYNE BRAMLITT, SR., ET AL., APPELLEE
747 So. 2d 485
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
[*486] PER CURIAM.
Having considered appellant/cross-ap-pellee’s response to the order to show cause issued June 28, 1999, the show cause order is hereby discharged. The appeal shall proceed as an appeal from a non-final order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(vi).
Having considered appellee/cross-appel-lant’s motion for extension of time to file its response to the order issued October 22, 1999, the motion is hereby granted and appellee/cross-appellant’s response is hereby accepted.
Having considered appellee/cross-appel-lant’s response to this court’s order issued October 22, 1999, the cross-appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
MINER, WOLF, AND KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Awad v. State, 778 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…is required so that the lower court may attach to its order portions of the record demonstrating that Appellant was sentenced pursuant to a plea agreement and hence is not entitled to relief on the grounds stated in his motion. See Flores v. State, 747 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). If the trial court is unable to provide the record attachments, the trial court is directed to enter an order permitting Appellant to refile a legally sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief within thirty days of…