ARTHUR KRUGGEL, APPELLANT,
v.
A. L. JOINER, APPELLEE
ARTHUR KRUGGEL, APPELLANT,
A. L. JOINER, APPELLEE
91 Fla. 255
Florida Supreme Court (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J.,. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jecy Crawford v. State, 146 Fla. 729 (Fla. 1941)…v. State, 75 Fla. 136, 77 South Rep. 669; Dukes v. State, 14 Fla. 499; Robinson v. State, 69 Fla. 521, 68 South. Rep. 649; 6 Ency. Evidence, p. 691.” That enunciation has been followed in Phillips v. State, 88 Fla. 117, 101 Sou. 204; Lowe v. State, 91 Fla. 255, 105 Sou. 829; Padgett v. State, 121 Fla. 42, 163 Sou. 291, and Forehand v. State, 126 Fla. 464, 171 Sou. 241. There appears in the record nothing which indicates that the jury disregarded the charge of the trial court in any respect. The jury just…