SEMIRA KUREIN, IND. AND ON BEHALF OF ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
THE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, APPELLEE
SEMIRA KUREIN, IND. AND ON BEHALF OF ETC., APPELLANT,
THE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, APPELLEE
748 So. 2d 1104
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having considered appellant’s response to the order to show cause, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to file a timely notice of appeal after a final order has been rendered by the trial court.
BOOTH, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 39 So. 3d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…6 So. 2d 1269, 1269 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (in an Anders appeal, holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter two restitution orders because the orders “were rendered after [the defendant] had filed her notice of appeal”); Frazier v. State, 748 So. 2d 1104, 1104 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (reaching this same conclusion, also in an Anders case, with respect to one restitution order); see also Pearson v. State, 686 So. 2d 721, 721 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (explaining that this principle applies even if “the trial co…
-
Kelly v. State, 65 So. 3d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…orney had no recollection of being directed to file an appeal. Testimony that petitioner’s attorney had no recollection of being asked to appeal is insufficient to show a good faith basis to dispute petitioner’s sworn testimony. See Reese v. State, 748 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (no hearing required where petition states that defendant asked attorney to appeal, and attorney has no independent recollection of the request); Walker v. State, 742 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (where state’s response shows th…