J. A. HUFFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM EASTERBROOK, AND HARRIET EASTERBROOK, WHO IS JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, WILLIAM EASTERBROOK, FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SUIT, APPELLEES

Fla. | 1933-02-23
108 Fla. 375 Florida Supreme Court (1933) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 146 So. 570
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised' of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. Feschheimer, 124 Fla. 757 (Fla. 1936)
    …have held that the liability of stockholders in a [*766] banking corporation arising under Section 6059 C. G. L. is primarily contractual in its nature and accrues when the assessment is duly made by the comptroller. Lisenby v. Motes, 108 Fla. 254, 146 So. 570, and cases therein cited. In the; instant case, the assessment had been made by the Comptroller and the claim against the testator perfected some months before his death. It therefore was an existing claim at the time of his death, and the claim is…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw