HUMBERTO GENIZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HUMBERTO GENIZ, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
750 So. 2d 781
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Gudinas v. State, 693 So. 2d 953 (Fla.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 936, 118 S.Ct. 345, 139 L.Ed.2d 267 (1997); Batista v. State, 685 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), review denied, 695 So. 2d 698 (Fla.1997).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jamil J. Agemy v. Health Bus. Solutions, LLC, 117 So. 3d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…DCA 2008); Spaulding, 666 So. 2d at 937. Where the enjoined party stipulates to the temporary injunction, the trial court is typically found not to have abused its discretion in denying a motion to dissolve. See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Engle, 750 So. 2d 781, 781-82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (affirming denial of motion to dissolve where the motion “was either invited [*900] or acquiesced to by defendants”); U.S. Mfg. & Galvanizing Corp. v. Renfrew, 592 So. 2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (declining to enterta…
-
Dalia Dippolito v. State, 225 So. 3d 233 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)…how cause directed at defense counsel for making prejudicial extrajudicial comments. As a result, evidentiary support existed for the trial court’s order, and good cause for the trial court’s order was shown. See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Engle, 750 So. 2d 781, 781-82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (distinguishing Rodriguez and finding good cause for gag order based on the “record evidence” and the court’s “specific finding” that such an order was necessary). b. The Defendant’s Second Argument On the defendant’s se…
-
DOW Jones & Co., Inc. v. Kaye, 256 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2001)…phase of Engle ended and during the compensatory damages phase, some of the tobacco companies moved to vacate the gag order. Judge Kaye denied the motion, and the state appellate court sustained the gag order. See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Engle, 750 So. 2d 781, 781 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A.2000). The state appellate court also denied media-entity Dow Jones’s motion to intervene in the appeal; Dow Jones participated as amicus curiae in the state appeal. In March 2000, Dow Jones and several other media entities (col…
Authorities Cited
- Gudinas v. State, 693 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 1997)
- Batista v. State, 685 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
- Singleton v. Baker, 522 U.S. 936 (U.S. 1997)
- Gudinas v. Florida, 522 U.S. 936 (U.S. 1997)