THOMAS C. MADDEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
THOMAS C. MADDEN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
751 So. 2d 142
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal from a denial of a 3.800(a) motion is barred by the law of the case doctrine. See Madden v. State, 651 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); see also Canty v. State, 715 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Raley v. State, 675 So. 2d 170, 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, MINER, and KAHN, JJ„ CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cleveland Sinclair v. State, 959 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…claims addressed at the evidentiary hearing, we reverse the summary denial of the other claim because the trial court failed to attach the portions of the record that were referenced as conclusively refuting the claim. See generally, Macon v. State, 751 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). On remand, the trial court is directed to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the claim or conduct an evidentiary hearing. Additionally, while the motion was pending, and prior to the expiration of the two-year…
Authorities Cited
- Raley v. State, 675 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
- Alphonsia Canty v. State, 715 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Madden v. State, 651 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)