DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLANT,
v.
KAREN I. SAULTER AND ROBERT W. SAULTER, APPELLEES
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLANT,
KAREN I. SAULTER AND ROBERT W. SAULTER, APPELLEES
751 So. 2d 163
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having considered appellant’s response to the court’s show cause order, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Mathis v. Florida Department of Corrections, 726 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)(stating that an order that determines entitlement to back-pay, but leaves open the amount due is interlocutory in nature). The dismissal is without prejudice to file a notice of appeal when a final order is rendered.
KAHN, BENTON, AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't OF Corr. v. Benny Chesnut, 847 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…he appellant’s response to the Court’s order of April 14, 2003, as well as the response filed by the Public Employees Relations Commission, the Court has determined that the order is not a final appealable order. See Dep’t of Corrections v. Saulter, 751 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); see also Mathis v. Dep’t of Corrections, 726 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. ERVIN, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.…
-
State v. Smith, 980 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…arties unanimously agree that decisions of this Court render the August 23, 2007, PERC order nonfinal. The parties cite to Mathis v. Florida Department of Corrections, 726 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Florida Department of Corrections v. Saulter, 751 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and Florida Department of Corrections v. Chesnut, 847 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). In Mathis, 726 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), Mathis appealed the denial of his petition for issuance of a computation of back pay form, whi…1 / 3
-
Fla. Dep't OF Corr. v. Schwarz, 134 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…ack pay rendered the issue similar to a calculation of prejudgment interest); Lazy Days’ RV Ctr., Inc. v. Shepley, 929 So. 2d 639, 639-40 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction, with citation to Mathis ); Dep’t of Corr. v. Saulter, 751 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction, with citation to Mathis ); Hill v. Div. of Ret., 687 So. 2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (“[An administrative order’s] finality depends on whether it has brought the administrative adjudica…
Authorities Cited
- Earnest Mathis, Jr. v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 726 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)