MAC W. STUART, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals his sentence for robbery with a deadly weapon claiming that his sentence is illegal because it was based on the 1995 sentencing guidelines, chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida (1995), which violates the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6, Florida Constitution. Based on the Florida Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement in Heggs v. State, No. SC93851, — So. 2d —, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb.17, 2000), wherein the court held that chapter 95-184 does violate the single subject rule, we remand this case for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time that the appellant committed his offense.
Remanded for resentencing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rufino Hernandez v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 32 So. 3d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…eard.” Id. at 908. Where a plaintiff resorts to substituted service, “strict compliance with the statutes governing this form of service is essential to obtaining valid personal jurisdiction over the defendants).” Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n v. Fandino, 751 So. 2d 752, 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Without such compliance, the trial court does not acquire jurisdiction over the defendant. We reverse and remand for entry of an order quashing service of process on defendant without prejudice to plaintiff seeking to serve…
-
Clauro Enters., Inc. v. Aragon Galiano Holdings, LLC, 16 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…rictly construed in order to protect a defendant’s due process rights. See Alvarado v. Cisneros, 919 So. 2d 585, 588-89 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Torres v. Arnco Constr., Inc., 867 So. 2d 583, 586 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Fed. Nat’l Mortgage Ass’n v. Fandino, 751 So. 2d 752, 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), and cases cited therein. Section 48.031(6), states as follows: If the only address for a person to be served, which is discoverable through [*1012] public records, is a private mailbox, substitute service may be made by le…
-
Jennings v. Montenegro, 792 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…ient.”). Overall, “[wjhere substitute service of process is used, strict compliance with the statutes governing this form of service is essential to obtaining valid personal jurisdiction over the defendant(s).” Federal Nat'l Mortg. Ass’n v. Fandino, 751 So. 2d 752, 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). When these jurisdictional allegations are not made, it is error for the trial court to fail to vacate its order and quash service. 1155 Inv. Co. v. Tamarac Club. Inc., 537 So. 2d 154, 155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Our review of…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence