STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MARK WILSON, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
MARK WILSON, APPELLEE
751 So. 2d 766
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM
AFFIRMED. See Celestin v. State, 737 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); United States v. Washington, 151 F. 3d 1354 (11th Cir.1998).
ALLEN, WOLF AND VAN NORWTICK, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McKINNEY v. State, 797 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2001)…ion certified to be of great public importance: DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION? McKinney v. State, 751 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. In State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla.2000), we answered the certified question in the negative. We therefore discharge jurisdiction. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J.…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Washington, 151 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir. 1998)
- Wilson v. State, 737 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
- Celestin v. State, 737 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)