JOHN A. HENDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
GETTIS A. HENDERSON, W. H. HENDRICK AND G. N. BENJAMIN, APPELLEES

Fla. | 1926-03-11
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J. Concur.
91 Fla. 457 Florida Supreme Court (1926) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respectve parties, and the record havng been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby afirfmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J. Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Henderson v. Gettis A. Henderson, 96 Fla. 872 (Fla. 1928)
    …tts et al, v. Henderson, 81 Fla. 138, 87 So. R. 313; Henderson v. Kendrick, 82 Fla. 110, 89 So. R. 635; Kendrick et al, v. Henderson, 87 Fla. 476, 100 So. R. 794; Henderson v. Henderson et al, 87 Fla. 470, 100 So. R. 792, and Henderson v. Henderson, 91 Fla. 457, 107 So. R. 644. Appellant contends that the later cases as here cited are in conflict with the earlier ones, that there is no equity [*873] shown for an accounting, that if any equity was properly alleged it is not proven and that the final decree…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw