ALAN EABY, APPELLANT,
v.
VOLUSIA COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND COUNTY OF VOLUSIA, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2000-03-06
No. 1D99-2347
Kahn, J., Webster, J., Padovano, J.
752 So. 2d 119 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida appellate court reversed the workers' compensation offset calculation to exclude cost-of-living increases to disability retirement benefits, certifying a question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court.


Holding

Cost-of-living increases to in-line-of-duty state disability retirement benefits must be excluded from the calculation of the workers' compensation offset.


Headnotes

[1] Cost-of-living increases to in-line-of-duty state disability retirement benefits are excluded from the workers' compensation offset calculation under Escambia County Sheriff's Department v. …

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

A claimant in a workers' compensation case appealed an order by the judge of compensation claims that allowed the employer and carrier to include cost…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the claimant appeals an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) allowing the employer and carrier (E/C) to include cost-of-living increases to the claimant’s in-line-of-duty state disability retirement benefits in the calculation of the workers’ compensation offset. Based on recent decisions of this court and the Florida Supreme Court, we reverse and remand with directions to exclude cost-of-living increases to the claimant’s disability retirement benefits from calculation of the offset. See, e.g., City of Clearwater v. Acker, 755 So. 2d 597 (Fla.1999); State v. Herny, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2467, — So. 2d -, 1999 WL 979474 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct.29, 1999); Aiderman v. Florida Plastering, 748 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), approved, 755 So. 2d 604 (Fla.2000). As in Hemy, we certify to the supreme court the following question of great public importance:

WHEN CALCULATING THE OFFSET FOR DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS PURSUANT TO ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT V. GRICE, 692 So. 2d 896 (Fla.1997), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO INCLUDE COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES TO THOSE BENEFITS?

REVERSED.

KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur. PADOVANO, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with written opinion.

Other
PADOVANO, J.,

PADOVANO, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I join in the decision, but for the reasons expressed in my separate opinion in University of West Florida and Alexsis Risk Management v. Mixson, 752 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), I would not certify the issue to the supreme court.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …laimant’s state disability retirement benefits. - HRS, State of Florida v. Pascual, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D596, — So. 2d -, 2000 WL 242770 (Fla. 1st DCA March 6, 2000), petition for review filed, No. 00-590 (Fla. March 20, 2000); Eaby v. Volusia County, 752 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); State v. Herny, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2467, — So. 2d -, 1999 WL 979474 (Fla. 1st DCA October 29, 1999), rev. granted, No. 96,962, — So. 2d — (Fla. March 20, 2000); see also Florida Department of Corrections v. Mulvaney, 752 So. 2d…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw