MICHAEL DAVID AUGUST DURRANT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL DAVID AUGUST DURRANT, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
752 So. 2d 131
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We concur with appellate counsel that treatment of this appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), is appropriate in this case. By pro se brief appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on count four. Assuming this challenge had been made with particularity in the trial court by motion for judgment of acquittal (it was not), it is nonetheless without merit. The evidence was legally sufficient to go to the jury. See State v. Law, 559 So. 2d 187 (Fla.1989).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wells v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 767 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…icable statute. A referee’s finding of misconduct cannot be disturbed if it is supported by competent and substantial evidence. See Nguyen v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 755 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Briceno v. Precision Delivery Sys., 752 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Absent a clearly erroneous decision by the Unemployment Appeals Commission, the Commission’s decision cannot be overturned. See Brooks v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 695 So. 2d 879, 881 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Rosa v. Jefferson’s S…
-
Jaqueline Montanez v. Compass Grp. USA, Inc., 796 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…PER CURIAM. Jaqueline Montanez appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. We conclude that the order is supported by the record. See Briceno v. Precision Delivery Sys., Inc., 752 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); DeJesus v. Riconed, Inc., 741 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). We see no abuse of discretion in the denial [*1217] of the request for a new hearing with an interpreter, where the prehearing notice advised the claimant to make a req…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- State v. Ronnie S. LAW, 559 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1989)