WILLIAM BURKE HARRIS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
PARIENTE, J.
We have for review the opinion in Harris v. State, 726 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), which certified conflict with the opinions in State v. Holland, 689 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), State v. Perry, 716 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), State v. Wells, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2000, — So. 2d -, 1998 WL 1157374 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 26, 1998), and State v. Alleman, 744 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 750 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1999), the decision of the Fifth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Kathyrn Hayes v. State, 750 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1999)
- The Agency FOR Health Care Admin. v. Palm Springs Gen. Hosp., Inc., 689 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- State v. Holland, 689 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Hudson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 716 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- State v. Perry, 716 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- Harris v. State, 726 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
- Copertino v. State, 726 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
- State v. Blaine Alleman, 744 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)