C. C. JOHNSON, AS LIQUIDATOR OF THE COMMERCIAL BANK OF ST. AUGUSTINE, A STATE BANKING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
F. M. LEONARD & CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Commercial Bank of St. Augustine's liquidator sued the drawer of a check that was deposited but dishonored when payment was stopped by the payee. The Florida Supreme Court held that a check drawer is not liable to the bank of deposit when the payee stops payment before collection, even after the check has been endorsed in blank and credit given to the depositor.
The drawer of a check is not responsible to the bank of deposit under these circumstances when the payee stops payment before the bank collects the check.
“In receiving items for deposit or collection, this bank acts only as depositor's collecting agent and assumes no responsibility beyond the exercise of due care. All items are credited subject to final payment in cash or solvent credits.”
The deposit slip language establishing the bank's limited role as collection agent rather than principal, which was central to the court's analysis.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn January 27, 1930, F. M. Leonard & Co. drew a $125 check on an Atlantic National Bank of Boston, payable to W. F. Wolfe. On January 29, 1930, Wolfe …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Negotiable Instruments cases and more on FLexlaw
C. C. Johnson, as Liquidator of the defunct Commercial Bank of St. Augustine, sued F. M. Leonard & Co., as drawer of a check which had been deposited in the defunct bank. The case was tried before the Circuit Judge without a jury. Judgment was entered in favor of defendant and plaintiff prosecutes writ of error.
*417The facts are as follows: On January 27, 1930, F. M. Leonard & Co., drew a check on the Atlantic National Bank of Boston, Mass., payable to the order of W. F. Wolfe. The amount of the check was $125.00. During, banking hours on January 29, 1930, W. F. Wolfe deposited the check in the Commercial Bank of St. Augustine. The check was indorsed in blank by the payee, but the deposit was made pursuant to a bank, deposit slip which contained the following : “In receiving items for deposit or collection, this bank acts only as depositor’s collecting agent and assumes no responsibility beyond the exercise of due care. All items are credited subject to final payment in cash or solvent credits.”
Credit on its books was given by the bank to the depositor. Thereafter when presented for payment the deposited check was dishonored, because the drawer, F. M. Leonard & Co. had stopped payment at the request of the payee, W. F. Wolfe.
The Commercial Bank of St. Augustine suspended business on January 29, 1930. Thereafter the plaintiff in error was appointed and qualified as Liquidator.
The question presented at the trial was; whether or not under the laws of Florida, the drawer of a bank check is discharged from liability thereon to a bank of deposit, when payment on the deposited check is stopped at the request of the payee, after the check has been endorsed in blank by the payee, who' has been given credit on the books of the bank, under a deposit slip containing a recitation to the effect that the bank of deposit agreed to act only as depositor’s collection agent with reference to the check, until final payment was received in cash or in solvent credits.
Our conclusion is that the maker or drawer of the check is not responsible to the bank of deposit Under the circumstances above stated, payment of the check having been *418stopped by the payee before collection was made by the bank of deposit. See Edwards v. Lewis, 98 Fla. 856, 124 Sou. Rep. 746; Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Malloy, 281 Fed. 997, 291 Fed. 763, 264 U. S. 160, 44 Sup. Ct. Rep. 296, 68 L. Ed. 617; Section 6834 C. G. L., 4748 R. G. S., Statute Laws of Florida. Compare Cunningham v Bunker, 45 Fed. (2nd) 458.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sorrells Bros. Packing Co., Inc. v. Union State Bank, 144 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…s a holder in due course and entitled to recover from Sorrells the face amount of the check with interest and costs. The appellant Sorrells predicates its claim for a reversal solely on the rulings pronounced in Johnson v. F. M. Leonard & Co., 1933, 108 Fla. 416, 146 So. 202, and contends that this case is controlling. We will pause at this time to note that the deposit was made in Texas and the relationships between depositor and depository would be governed by Texas law. However, the case has been briefe…1 / 2
-
The Riviera Club v. The City of Ormond, 147 Fla. 401 (Fla. 1941)…lands are located, until it can and does render municipal benefits. That the remedy of injunction may be invoked to prohibit the exercise of taxing power by the municipality is well settled. See State ex rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon Park, 108 Fla. 416, 149 Sou. 409; Martha Bright Farms v. Broward Port Authority, 117 Fla. 361, 158 Sou. 70; State ex rel. Harrington v. City of Pompano, 136 Fla. 730, 188 Sou. 610; City of South Miami v. State ex rel. Landis, 140 Fla. 740, 192 Sou. 624; City of Winter…
Authorities Cited
- Fed. Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Malloy, 264 U.S. 160 (U.S. 1924)
- Edwards v. Lewis, 98 Fla. 956 (Fla. 1929)