VANNY PHILLIP FLOYD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VANNY PHILLIP FLOYD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
753 So. 2d 768
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979); Stone v. State, 688 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 697 So. 2d 512 (Fla.1997).
MINER, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Claims Mgmt., Inc. v. Grenier, 777 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…ins competent substantial evidence supporting the JCC’s authorization of an IME for purposes other than resolving a dispute concerning the provision of medical treatment, care and attendance, we affirm. Id.; see also Morton v. Rinker Material Corp., 753 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Finally, we do not view the JCC’s authorization of an IME by a vascular surgeon to be violative of our holding in Watkins Eng’rs & Constr. v. Wise, 698 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Here, unlike Wise, the condition for which…
-
Kohout v. Benefit Administrators, 781 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…tains competent substantial evidence supporting the JCC’s authorization of an IME for purposes other than resolving a dispute concerning the provision of medical treatment, care and attendance, we affirm.”); see also Morton v. Rinker Material Corp., 753 So. 2d 768, 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“We are unable to conclusively determine that, at the time the judge of compensation claims entered the order compelling an independent medical examination by a physician outside the managed care network, no dispute existed…
Authorities Cited
- Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Stone v. State, 688 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)