JOSE LUIS BORREGO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conclusively Refute cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Jose Luis Borrego appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that in entering his no contest plea, he was given affirmative misadvice about the amount of time he would be required to serve, and was not informed of the reasonable consequences of habituali-zation. The State properly concedes that the plea colloquy and record do not conclusively refute the appellant’s claims. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); State v. Leroux, 689 So. 2d 235 (Fla.1996); Rivero v. State, 744 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Isaza v. State, 746 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Bell v. State, 746 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Rensoli v. State, 718 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); see also Ashley v. State, 614 So. 2d 486 (Fla.1993). Accordingly the order denying postconviction relief is reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ashley v. State, 614 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1993)
- State v. Leroux, 689 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1996)
- Rensoli v. State, 718 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- GIL v. Kloster Cruise Ltd., 746 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- Jerome v. State, 744 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- Rivero v. State, 744 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- Clemente Isaza v. State, 746 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)