STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL THOMPSON, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2000-03-17
No. 5D99-2114
THOMPSON, J., concurs., GRIFFIN, J., dissents without opinion.
754 So. 2d 126 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2000) Caution
Cited by 20 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A downward departure sentence based on a defendant's health or age is improper if the defendant's condition can be treated by the Department of Corrections or if the defendant's age does not prevent appreciation of consequences.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant pled guilty to felony driving while license cancelled, suspended or revoked. The trial court departed downward from the sentencing guide…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
ORFINGER, M„ Senior Judge.

ORFINGER, M„ Senior Judge.

Appellee was charged by information with and pled guilty to felony driving while license cancelled, suspended or revoked in violation of section 322.34(2), Florida Statutes. Because of an extensive prior felony record, the lowest permissible prison sentence based on the guidelines was 64.5 months. The trial judge departed downward and sentenced appellee to a prison term of 36 months. The state appeals and we reverse.

At the sentencing hearing appellee provided the court with a physician’s letter stating that appellee was a non-insulin diabetic and that he had sciatica. He also indicated that he had heart problems and that he took oral medications to correct these various health problems. Section 921.0026(2)(d), Florida Statutes (1999), permits downward departures where a defendant requires specialized treatment for a physical disability and the defendant is amenable to such treatment. No evidence was presented to the trial court that specialized treatment was required, or that any required treatment could not be provided by the Department of Corrections. See, State v. Abrams, 706 So. 2d 903, 904 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

The trial court also referred to appellee’s age as a basis for departure. Ap-pellee was 48 years old at the time of sentencing. Section 921.0026(2)(k) provides a reason for departure where “... (a)t the time of the offense the defendant was too young to appreciate the consequences of the offense.” At 48, defendant hardly qualifies as a youthful offender. Neither was there any evidence before the trial court to indicate that defendant could not appreciate the consequences of his offense. The sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for imposition of a guidelines sentence.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON, J., concurs.

GRIFFIN, J., dissents without opinion.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Tyrrell, 807 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …ical disability, there was no evidence presented showing that Jones required specialized treatment for his condition, or that any [*128] treatment he required could not be adequately provided by the Department of Corrections.9 See State v. Thompson, 754 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (holding that downward departure was improper in the absence of evidence that the defendant required specialized treatment or that any such treatment could not be provided by the Department of Corrections). Accordingly, no compet…
  • State v. Mann, 866 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
    …s treatment that is not available in the Department of Corrections. See State v. Porche, 826 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); State v. Tyrrell, 807 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); State v. White, 755 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); State v. Thompson, 754 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); State v. Stewart, 749 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); State v. Abrams, 706 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Assuming that Mann does suffer from a mental disorder, there has been no showing that he requires specialized treatment tha…
  • State v. Chubbuck, 141 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. 2014)
    …DCA 2005), State v. Wheeler, 891 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), State v. Green (Green I), 890 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), State v. Mann, 866 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), State v. Tyrrell, 807 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), State v. Thompson, 754 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), and State v. Abrams, 706 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. This case pertains to subsection 921.0026(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2009), which authorizes a trial court to give a…

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw