DANIEL F. WALSH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-01-19
No. 3D99-2913
Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
754 So. 2d 742 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Daniel F. Walsh appeals an order denying postconviction relief, in which he claims that he does not qualify as a habitual offender because a North Carolina conviction should not have been counted as a predicate offense. A review of this court’s records discloses that this exact claim was rejected by this court in Walsh v. State, 727 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). This court’s earlier ruling is dispositive.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nationwide Lift Trucks, Inc. v. Smith, 832 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
    …priateness of sanctions for failing to preserve evidence depends on: (1) willfulness or bad faith of the responsible party, (2) the extent of prejudice suffered by the other party, and (3) what is required to cure the prejudice. Harrell v. Maybeiry, 754 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) and cases cited. In the present case the trial court found, applying these criteria, that plaintiffs were unable to proceed without the altered or lost evidence and, indeed, Nationwide has not suggested a credible lesser sanction…
  • Robinson v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 887 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2004)
    …of the trial court’s authority, bad faith, or willful disregard to a trial court’s order, or conduct which evinces deliberate callousness. 443 So. 2d at 946; see also Hetherington v. Donner, 786 So. 2d 9, 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Harrell v. Mayberry, 754 So. 2d 742, 744-45 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Amlan, Inc. v. Detroit Diesel Corp., 651 So. 2d 701, 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). In this case, the issue presented to the Fourth District was the propriety of the sanctions imposed against the respondent for discovery viola…
  • Anne Russell v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 779 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
    …ction less serious than judgment on the pleadings. While we do not condone counsel’s actions, we conclude that the judgment on the pleadings for counsel’s contumacious disregard for the trial court’s orders was improper. Compare Harrell v. Mayberry, 754 So. 2d 742, 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (reversing a default judgment on the issue of liability as a sanction for discovery violations), and Ad Miller Assocs. v. Glynn, 736 So. 2d 798, 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (holding that trial court abused its discretion in enteri…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw