WILLIAM HAUCK, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
OCEAN LANDING, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-03-08
No. 3D99-1855
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GERSTEN, JJ.
754 So. 2d 754 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gautreaux v. Notarantonio, 687 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Eli Levy v. Levy, 862 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …wife did not work and was unable to work because of her immigration status. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees to the former wife. See Binker v. Binker, 781 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Baker v. Baker, 754 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Next, the former wife contends the trial court erred in the amount of income it imputed to the former husband and in denying the former wife’s motion to deviate upwards from the child support guidelines. We disagree on both issu…
  • Rorrer v. Orban, 215 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …6) (noting husband’s “far superior financial posture” and the delay tactics he employed and concluding “that the trial court breached its discretion in not granting Laurie all or most of the fees and costs expended by her attorney”); Baker v. Baker, 754 So. 2d 754, 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“It is clear from this record that Roland’s significant earnings give him a far superior ability to pay Addie’s attorney’s fees and costs. The law is clear that in dissolution cases attorney’s fees and costs are to be borne…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw