WILLIAM W. MOCK, JR., APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,

v.

PEGGY R. MOCK, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Citator

Cited By

• Watrous v. State, 793 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …has made an ex parte determination that probable cause exists, the person must be detained in a secure facility pending trial. In some cases, persons have been held for a year or more while awaiting their commitment trial. See, e.g., Sjuts v. State, 754 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (noting that as of the writing of the opinion, Sjuts had been detained over a year awaiting his civil commitment trial). I would conclude that the loss of freedom associated with these procedures is a definite, immediate, and larg…
• Kinder v. State, 779 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
  …islature to enact more comprehensive legislation and for the supreme court to adopt rules of procedure for the implementation of the Act. Accordingly, we renew our plea to those two bodies to do so with all possible speed. See, e.g., Sjuts v. State, 754 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (joining the Fourth District Court of Appeal in its plea to the Florida Supreme Court to appoint a committee to fashion rules for the implementation of the Act). ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur. . §§ 394.910…
• Eutsay v. State, 103 So. 3d 181 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …ognizing this standard but granting the petition due to unique circumstances not applicable to the instant case). Similarly, delay in the initial proceedings is not the type of harm contemplated by Florida’s certiorari standards. See Sjuts v. State, 754 So. 2d 781, 783-84 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (acknowledging that the delay caused by a discovery order in proceedings under Florida’s Involuntary Commitment of Sexual Predators Act was “necessarily more burdensome” for the defendant, who was being detained while the…