SHONTELLE M. BLACK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2000-03-22
No. 4D00-0680
WARNER, C.J., DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
754 So. 2d 792 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence made pursuant to rule 3.800(a)

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm. See Judge v. State, 596 So. 2d 73, 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)(en banc), holding that scoresheet errors not apparent from the face of the scoresheet are not correctable on a motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a). See also Lomont v. State, 506 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), holding that sentencing score-sheet computation error based upon disputed prior offenses should have been raised at sentencing or on direct appeal and not raised in a motion for postconviction relief.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, C.J., DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. . Appellant’s motion, having been filed after the thirty day filing deadline, is treated as a motion made pursuant to rule 3.800(a).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jackson v. State, 140 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
    …o testimony and evidence concerning the prior incidents. Under these circumstances, we are unable to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the erroneous admission of the Williams rule evidence did not contribute to the verdict. See Jones v. State, 754 So. 2d 792, 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Conclusion For the reasons stated above, we reverse Jackson’s judgment and sentence and remand for a new trial. REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial. BENTON and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur. . Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d…
  • McKEEHAN v. State, 838 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
    …f fact.” Goodwin v. State, 751 So. 2d 537, 542 (Fla.1999) (quoting State v. Lee, 531 So. 2d 133,137 (Fla.1988)). The question, therefore, is not whether the evidence against the defendant was overwhelming. Lee, 531 So. 2d at 136-37; Jones v. State, 754 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). A reviewing court “must resist the temptation to make its own determination of whether a guilty verdict could be sustained by excluding the impermissible evidence and examining only the permissible evidence.” Goodwin, 751 So. 2d…
  • Williams v. State, 899 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
    …a. 4th DCA 2001). In addition, the state and appellant disagree about when he was released from supervision, and resolution of this claim would require an evidentiary hearing. See Maynard v. State, 763 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Black v. State, 754 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s order without prejudice for appellant to file a rule 3.850 motion. FARMER, C.J., STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw