DOUGLAS PFOUTZ, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Lamb v. Matetzschk, 906 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 2005)
  …e awarded reasonable costs, including investigative expenses, and attorney’s fees, calculated in accordance with the guidelines promulgated by the Supreme Court, incurred from the date the offer was served. . See C & S Chemicals, Inc. v. McDougald, 754 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). . By the time the third offer of judgment was made, Lamb had settled with Mrs. Ma-tetzschk. . See Aurbach v. Gallina, 753 So. 2d 60, 62 (Fla.2000): Florida's dangerous instrumentality doctrine imposes strict vicarious liabilit…
• Attorneys' Title Ins. Fund, Inc. v. Gorka, 36 So. 3d 646 (Fla. 2010)
  …ired differentiation based on the plain language and goals of the statute: “Each party who receive[s] an offer of settlement is entitled ... to evaluate the offer as it pertains to him or her.” Id. at 199 (quoting C & S Chemicals, Inc. v. McDougald, 754 So. 2d 795, 797-98 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)). Reading the plain language of the statute, we recognized that the reference to “party” in the singular in section 768.79(2)(b) indicated the intent of the Legislature that an offer must specify the amount attributable to…
• Allstate Indem. Co. v. Solen Hingson and Annette Hingson, 808 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 2002)
  …denied Allstate’s motion for attorney’s fees citing the policy considerations regarding undifferentiated offers of judgment enunciated in section 768.79. On appeal, the district court affirmed on the authority of C & S Chemicals, Inc. v. McDougald, 754 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). See Hingson, 774 So. 2d at 44. In doing so, the district court acknowledged conflict with Herzog. C & S also involved a pre-1997 offer. In that case, the district court reasoned: As this court recently noted, “[t]o further the…

Authorities Cited

• Johnson v. State, 438 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1983)
• Saffor v. State, 660 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 1995)
• Elvia Padgett v. State, 551 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)