MICHAEL T. COOLEN, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL W. MOORE, APPELLEE
MICHAEL T. COOLEN, APPELLANT,
MICHAEL W. MOORE, APPELLEE
755 So. 2d 816
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having considered appellant’s response to the court’s order, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Brown v. Campion, 757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant filing a notice of appeal when a final order of dismissal is rendered.
BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK, AND PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jacobs v. State, 827 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…de an express, distinct demand for performance on the respondent. In addition, mandamus is not the proper vehicle to address errors in a criminal case where a direct appeal and postconviction motions provide adequate remedies. See Donald v. State, 755 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Jacobs has an adequate alternative remedy. He can file a rule 3.800(a) or rule 3.850 motion seeking correction of his guideline scoresheet and resentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. Proc. 3.800; 3.850. Accordingly, the petition for writ…
-
Hastings v. Hon. Barry Krischer, 840 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…rly, mandamus is not available to remedy alleged errors in a criminal case where the avenues of direct appeal and motions for postconviction relief provide an adequate remedy. See Jacobs v. State, 827 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Donald v. State, 755 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)(denying petition for writ of mandamus complaining of actions or omissions of trial judge and defense counsel in criminal prosecution, for which direct appeal and postconviction relief are adequate remedies). In this case, if the…
-
Vega v. Kilhefner, 931 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…n and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court determines that Vega’s filings do not fully comply with the requirements of its case management order, it should afford him the opportunity to correct any deficiencies. See Woullard v. Bishop, 755 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). In addition, Vega’s initial brief presents a point challenging the trial court’s order finding him to be indigent for purposes of [*224] this appeal, but directing that a lien be placed on his inmate trust account to recoup fi…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Brown v. Campion, 757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)