E. J. REED AND T. H. MOORE, JR., APPELLANTS,
v.
ARENA B. HAHN, APPELLEE
E. J. REED AND T. H. MOORE, JR., APPELLANTS,
ARENA B. HAHN, APPELLEE
91 Fla. 1044
Florida Supreme Court (1926)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 109 So. 94
Cited by 104 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
— The decree herein dismissed a bill of complaint seeking specific performance of a contract made by an agent to lease real estate. This was proper, because the authority of the ’agent to execute the contract was denied and not duly proven, and ratification was not shown, therefore the decree is affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (33 total)
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Fred H. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710 (Fla. 1929)…eading it is sufficient. [*726] See Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Simon, supra; State v. Bethea, 61 Fla. 60, 55 So. R. 550; Ex parte Gilleti, 70 Fla. 442, 70 So. R. 446; Van Pelt v. Hillard, 75 Fla. 792, 78 So. R. 693. In the case of Smith v. Chase, 91 Fla. 1044, 109 So. R. 94, Mr. Justice Whitfield, speaking for the court, said, in substance, that the purpose of the first clause of Section 16 Article III of the State Constitution was to secure singleness of the subject of a legislative enactment and to req…
-
State of Fla. on the relation of Fred H. Davis v. The Honorable E. C. Love, 99 Fla. 333 (Fla. 1930)…onzalez v. Samuel Palmes, 23 Fla. 620, 3 So. R. 171; State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Burns, 38 Fla. 367, 21 So. R. 290; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. R. 72; Ex Parte Knight and Knight, 52 Fla. 144, 41 So. R. 786; Smith v. Chase, 91 Fla. 1044, 109 So. R. 94; Prairie Pebble Phos. Co. v. Silverman, 80 Fla. 541, 86 So. R. 508; Albritton v. State of Florida, 82 Fla. 20, 89 So. R. 360; Martin et al. v. Dade Muck Land Co., 96 Fla. 530, 116 So. R. 449. The organic section has reference to provi…
-
Gray v. Cent. Fla. Lumber Co., 104 Fla. 446 (Fla. 1932)…e purpose of Section Sixteen of Article Three of the Constitution is to require that the title to all acts be of such specifications as to put the legislature and the public on notice of the nature of the proposed act. Smith vs. Chase, 91 Fla. 1044, 109 So. 94. When the title to an act expresses its contents with sufficient certainty to give reasonable notice thereof, it may not be an index to the act but if it reasonably leads to inquiry as to its [*451] provisions, it is sufficient. Lainhart vs. Catts,…
Previewing 3 of 33 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence