JOHN WESLEY MIMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 5th DCA | 2000-03-17
No. 5D99-1490
W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
756 So. 2d 162 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla.1974); Cavalcante v. Florida Parole Commission, 414 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also, Wigfals v. Florida Parole Commission, 691 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …plaintiff, pursuant to an oral motion, “at least one opportunity to amend or supplement the affidavit,” prior to entering summary judgment as deficiencies “were largely technical and may have been amenable to correction”). See also Hammond v. Joyce, 756 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (finding that where deficiencies in plaintiffs affidavit in opposition to motion for summary judgment were correctable, trial court erred in striking affidavit without granting plaintiffs request to amend); Charlonne v. Rosenthal,…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw