SOLEIL SHUTTERS, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
RAMON MARTINEZ, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-04-12
Nos. 3D98-257, 3D97-2656
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
756 So. 2d 200 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in any of the defendant-appellants’ claims of error and we therefore affirm on the main appeal. § 768.0425, Fla. Stat. (1999); HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses, S.A., 685 So. 2d 1238 (Fla.1996). On the cross-appeal, however, we conclude that the trial court erroneously denied the plaintiffs’ claim to pre-judgment interest. See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985); State Farm Fire & Cas. v. Albert, 618 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), review denied, 629 So. 2d 135 (Fla.1993); Charles Buzbee & Sons, Inc. v. Falkner, 585 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The cause is remanded solely for the purpose of adding that item, in the undisputed sum of $93,731.67, to the judgment under review nunc pro tunc its date, January 6,1998.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hutchins v. State, 937 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …n alleged violation of condition (5). Therefore, the trial court’s order is affirmed in all respects except as to its finding that appellant had violated condition (5). Appellant need not be present for disposition, on remand. See Stephens v. State, 756 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Dunlap v. State, 405 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw