THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MIKAL WHEELER, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals from an order invalidating a sentence which the parties previously stipulated in a plea agreement would be imposed if, as actually occurred, the defendant violated the probation which was granted as a condition of suspending the sentence. We find no basis whatever for this ruling both because the sentence was not an illegal one and because the defendant could not properly be heard to contend otherwise after receiving the benefit of the bargain. See Madrigal v. State, 545 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate sentencing in accordance with the prior agreement and the applicable law. See Williams v. State, 594 So. 2d 273 (Fla.1992).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Diaz-Gonzalez v. State, 932 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…st one occasion, he passed this message to Anna Arias, a person who defendant claimed at trial was an alibi to the allegations. Based upon these facts, a reasonable juror could infer defendant knew of the officer’s investigation. See Brown v. State, 756 So. 2d 230, 231-32 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(permitting evidence of flight, concealment, or resistance where “the victims knew [the defendant] by name and the police had been to his house attempting to locate him during the fourteen days between the robbery and [the…
-
Williams v. State, 199 So. 3d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…lliams’ and his girlfriend’s homes looking for him the morning after the crime. If Williams had been discovered in Georgia within a few weeks or even a month after the crimes, the evidence of flight may well have been admissible. See Brown v. State, 756 So. 2d 230, 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (‘We likewise find no abuse of discretion in the instant case where the victims knew Brown by name and the police had been to his house attempting to locate him during the fourteen days between the robbery and Brown’s arrest.…
-
Webb v. State, 767 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…allenges to chapter 95-182, I conclude Webb does not have standing to challenge the constitutionality of that chapter. Therefore, but for Thompson, I would affirm Webb’s sentence as a violent career criminal and certify conflict with Brown v. State, 756 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). . This window period would be correct if the applicable statutory provision was not amended in another chapter law before the biennial adoption of the 1995 amendments. See State v. Johnson, 616 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla.1993) ("Once re…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 594 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 1992)
- Domingo Antonio Madrigal v. State, 545 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)