R.A., A JUVENILE, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Trial court properly imposed thirty days of home detention as a special condition of community control for a juvenile who entered a nolo contendere plea to armed burglary, and the petition for habeas corpus is denied.
Home detention as a special condition of community control is an appropriate sanction for a juvenile adjudicated delinquent for armed burglary.
[1] Home detention is an authorized community-based sanction under section 985.03(13) and 985.23(4) when a trial court withholds adjudication and declines to commit a juvenil…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceR.A., a juvenile, entered a plea of nolo contendere to armed burglary. The trial court withheld adjudication and sentenced him to community control wi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Home Detention cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
R.A., a juvenile, entered a plea of nolo contendere to armed burglary. The trial court withheld adjudication and sentenced him to community control, imposing thirty days of home detention as a special condition. The trial court denied R.A.’s subsequent request to revoke home detention. R.A. now petitions this court for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Section 985.03(13), Florida Statutes (1999), provides that “[c]ommunity control is an individualized program in which the freedom of the child is limited and the child is restricted to noninstitutional quarters or restricted to the child’s home in lieu of commitment to the custody of the Department of Juvenile Justice.” Once the court determines not to adjudicate and commit to the Department of Juvenile Justice, it shall determine the appropriate community based sanctions, which “may include, but are not limited to, participation in substance abuse treatment, restitution in money or in kind, a curfew, revocation or suspension of the driver’s license of the child, community service, and appropriate educational programs as determined by the district school board.” See § 985.23(4), Fla. Stat. (1999). Based upon the forgoing, it is clear that the trial court’s sentence was wholly appropriate in this case. Therefore, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied.