FLOYD HOWARD, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Powell v. State, 120 So. 3d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
  …nces from it in the light most favorable to sustaining the order.” State v. DeLuca, 40 So. 3d 120, 123 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Of course, “a suppression order that turns on an issue of law is reviewed by the de novo standard of review.” Ikner v. State, 756 So. 2d 1116, 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Here, our task is made easy because there are no disputed facts: the officers candidly explained what they did and why they did it. No dispute exists that the officers were within the curtilage of the home when they peere…
• McMASTER v. State, 780 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …a motion to suppress can present mixed questions of law and fact. Lester v. State, 754 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The findings of fact made by the trial court are reviewed pursuant to the substantial competent evidence standard. Ikner v. State, 756 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Warren. The trial court’s application of the law is reviewed pursuant to the de novo standard. Ikner, State v. Ramos, 755 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Warren. Thus we proceed to review the findings of fact and the trial court…
• State v. Javonte L. Wimberly, 988 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
  …t. McMaster v. State, 780 So. 2d 1026, 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (citing Lester v. State, 754 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)). [*119] Findings of fact made by the trial court are subject to the substantial competent evidence standard. Ikner v. State, 756 So. 2d 1116, 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The application of the law by the trial court, however, is reviewed de novo. McMaster, 780 So. 2d at 1028; State v. Ramos, 755 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); see Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134…

Authorities Cited

• Keys v. State, 500 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1986)
• Tobias Barfield v. State, 594 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 1992)
• Thompson v. State, 478 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
• State v. Linford Fletcher, 530 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 1988)
• Linford Fletcher v. State, 508 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)