THOMAS L. CARRIN, APPELLANT,
v.
MILDRED R. GOODE, A/K/A MILDRED K. MERRILL, ET AL., APPELLEE
THOMAS L. CARRIN, APPELLANT,
MILDRED R. GOODE, A/K/A MILDRED K. MERRILL, ET AL., APPELLEE
758 So. 2d 1131
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2000)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
THOMPSON, J., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion.
Other
GRIFFIN, J.,
concurring in part; dissenting in part.
I believe we do have jurisdiction pursuant to Article 5, Section 4(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution, so dismissal is not appropriate. Notwithstanding my doubts about the trial court’s power to award an automobile to a cohabitant who never owned it, given the panel’s affirmance in the related case (5D99-781), we are bound to affirm in this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
First Union Nat'l Bank v. Turney, 824 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…the professional duty of an attorney and no privilege attaches to a communication and transaction between an attorney and client with respect to transactions constituting the making of a false claim or the perpetration of a fraud.”); State v. Marks, 758 So. 2d 1131, 1133 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The evidence code provides: (4) There is no lawyer-client privilege under this section when: (a) The services of the lawyer were sought or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the client…
-
Castillo v. State, 254 So. 3d 477 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)…ars after a prior incident of racketeering conduct. § 895.02(4), Fla. Stat. This court has previously addressed whether two or more criminal acts committed at the same time constitute separate incidents of racketeering conduct. In State v. Marks, 758 So. 2d 1131, 1138 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), the defendant was alleged to have uttered four perjurious statements over the course of a single deposition. We concluded that while each perjurious statement might qualify as a separate criminal act, the deposition duri…
-
Redding v. Lee (M.D. Fla. 2025)…or the transfer of civil cases between judges when they "might be appropriately 5 Plaintiff cites to two cases for the proposition that ex parte communications “are improper and violate due process rights." (Doc. 1 at 5-6) (citing State v. Marks, 758 So. 2d 1131, 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) and Jennings v. Dade Cnty., 589 So. 2d 1337, 1339 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)). Both Marks and Jennings, however, were before the appellate courts on writs of certiorari and are inapposite to this case. Plaintiff also cites Harris v…