RAPHAEL SHABTAI, APPELLANT,

v.

FLEA MARKET U.S.A., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Overton v. State, 801 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 2001)
  …. State, 395 So. 2d 1145, 1151 (Fla.1980) (holding that prosecutor was entitled to inquire into exact nature of a prior felony conviction where defense counsel sought to establish that that prior conviction was inconsequential); Washington v. State, 758 So. 2d 1148, 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) [*901] (“[F]alse impression permitted the state to fill in the gaps in the truth so tactfully omitted during cross-examination.”). In this case, defense counsel’s reason for questioning the detective about the internal aff…
• Lebron v. State, 799 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 2001)
  …was error, “the other prevailing circumstances, including the length of the deliberations, the lateness of the hour, the condition of the jurors, and the jury’s disclosure of their numerical split raise[ ] additional concerns”); Washington v. State, 758 So. 2d 1148, 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Scoggins v. State, 691 So. 2d 1185, 1187-88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (concurring and agreeing with the Michigan Supreme Court’s reasoning that, “[w]hen combined with comments that belie the judge’s feelings, or with instruction…
• Roma v. State, 785 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …alse duty to decide. Thomas v. State, 748 So. 2d 970 (Fla.1999); Gahley. A coerced verdict in a criminal case infringes upon two rights guaranteed by the constitution-the right to a fair trial and the right to an impartial jury. Washington v. State, 758 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, Case No. SC00-1318 (Fla. Nov.14, 2000). Although not required to do so, it is recommended that trial judges give the Allen charge found in the standard jury instructions. See Thomas, 748 So. 2d at 978, n. 7. This instru…

Authorities Cited

• Cheezem Dev. Corp. v. Maddox Roof Serv., Inc., 362 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
• Singer v. Fla. Paving Co., Inc., 459 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)