EDDIE HOLLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2000-04-12
No. 4D00-0923
KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ, concur.
758 So. 2d 1156 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Moore v. State, 634 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Willems Calixte v. State, 53 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …tion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). It raises an issue not cognizable on a motion to correct an illegal sentence, because he is attacking the judgment, not the sentence. See Anderson v. State, 758 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Treated as a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, the motion is untimely, and even considering the substance, his claim is meritless. He contends that the judge, state attorney,…
  • Hemingway v. State, 919 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. As to the first ground for relief, see State v. Mancino, 705 So. 2d 1379 (Fla.1998); Anderson v. State, 758 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 4th DCA) (not cited), rev. denied, 779 So. 2d 269 (Fla.2000). As to the second ground, see; e.g., State v. Williams, 854 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), rev. denied, 869 So. 2d 541 (Fla. [*611] 2004); McCraney v. State, 830 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 5t…
  • Williams v. State, 49 So. 3d 866 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed, but for reasons different from those provided by the state below; the ground for relief is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Anderson v. State, 758 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Chanquet v. State, 646 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw