EDDIE HOLLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EDDIE HOLLAND, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
758 So. 2d 1156
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Moore v. State, 634 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Willems Calixte v. State, 53 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…tion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). It raises an issue not cognizable on a motion to correct an illegal sentence, because he is attacking the judgment, not the sentence. See Anderson v. State, 758 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Treated as a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, the motion is untimely, and even considering the substance, his claim is meritless. He contends that the judge, state attorney,…
-
Hemingway v. State, 919 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. As to the first ground for relief, see State v. Mancino, 705 So. 2d 1379 (Fla.1998); Anderson v. State, 758 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 4th DCA) (not cited), rev. denied, 779 So. 2d 269 (Fla.2000). As to the second ground, see; e.g., State v. Williams, 854 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), rev. denied, 869 So. 2d 541 (Fla. [*611] 2004); McCraney v. State, 830 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 5t…
-
Williams v. State, 49 So. 3d 866 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed, but for reasons different from those provided by the state below; the ground for relief is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Anderson v. State, 758 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Chanquet v. State, 646 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Moore v. State, 634 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)