TYRONE RACKLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2000-05-26
No. 5D00-1094
DAUKSCH, HARRIS and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
758 So. 2d 1250 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks this court’s writ of mandamus requiring the lower court to rule upon a motion he has filed there. Because an appeal from his conviction in the case is pending in this court, the lower court has no jurisdiction. Once the appeal is over and jurisdiction is returned by mandate then the lower court will have jurisdiction to rule on his pending motion.

MANDAMUS DENIED.

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Holley v. State, 859 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
    …s of the rendition of the order.” The time for bringing a timely appeal of this order has passed and the jurisdiction of the circuit court to enter a different order is questionable. Thus, mandamus is an inappropriate remedy. Cf. Rackley v. State, 758 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (mandamus to compel lower court to rule on pending motion denied where appeal of final order is pending on appeal and lower court has no jurisdiction). See also Stupelli v. Dimitrouleas, 616 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (petiti…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw