FRANKLIN KREUTZER, APPELLANT,

v.

NORMAN AKINS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• QBE Ins. Corp. v. Chalfonte Condo. Apt. Ass'n, Inc., 94 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 2012)
  …LYSIS This Court has recounted the evolution of insurance contract litigation in Florida in a number of its previous cases. See, e.g., Allstate Indem. Co. v. Ruiz, 899 So. 2d 1121, 1125-1129 (Fla.2005); Talat Enters., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 758 So. 2d 1278, 1281 (Fla.2000); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laforet, 658 So. 2d 55, 58-59 (Fla.1995). Until the twentieth century, actions for breaches of insurance contracts were treated the same as any other breach of contract action. Laforet, 658 So. 2d…
• Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 886 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 2004)
  …The court also must “take such measures as are necessary to protect each defendant’s right to counsel.” New subdivision (c) is based on Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 44(c) and was proposed by the Rules Committee in response to Dixon v. State, 758 So. 2d 1278, 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (urging the promulgation of such a rule). Like the federal rule, the new subdivision does not specify the particular measures that the court must take to protect a defendant’s right to counsel. Therefore, we have added a com…
• State v. Reuben Alexis, 180 So. 3d 929 (Fla. 2015)
  …v. State, 140 So. 3d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of this Court, Gorby v. State, 630 So. 2d 544 (Fla.1993), as well as a decision of another district court of appeal, Dixon v. State, 758 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), on a question of law. Alexis held that a waiver is required in the absence of an actual conflict, while Gorby and Dixon held that a waiver is necessary only if there is an actual conflict. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• DiSTEFANO Constr., Inc. v. Fid. & Deposit Co. OF Md., 597 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 1992)