LARRY J. ROBINSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2000-05-18
No. SC96481
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur., WELLS, J., dissents.
759 So. 2d 673 Florida Supreme Court (2000)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the decision below must be quashed and the case remanded for resentencing due to a prior ruling that the statute used for sentencing was unconstitutional.


Facts & Procedural History

Larry J. Robinson was sentenced as a violent career criminal. The appellate court affirmed his sentence, but certified conflict with another district …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Robinson v. State, 738 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), in which the First District Court of Appeal affirmed Larry J. Robinson’s violent career criminal sentence and certified conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on our decision in State v. Thompson, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1999), in which we held unconstitutional chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule, we quash the decision below and remand for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect on April 10, 1997, the date on which Robinson committed the underlying offense in this case.1 See Thompson, 750 So. 2d at 649 (remanding for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time the defendant committed her offenses).

It is so ordered. HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. WELLS, J., dissents.

. Based on our decision in Salters v. State, 758 So. 2d 667 (Fla.2000), we determine that Robinson has standing to raise a single subject rule challenge to chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida. Moreover, we agree with Robinson's uncontested assertion that he may challenge his violent career criminal sentence despite the fact that such sentence resulted from a negotiated plea agreement. See, e.g., Shelton v. State, 739 So. 2d 1235, 1236-37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw