WILLIAM H. STEPHENSON, PETITIONER,
v.
HON. H. C. PETTEWAY, AS JUDGE OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, RESPONDENT
WILLIAM H. STEPHENSON, PETITIONER,
HON. H. C. PETTEWAY, AS JUDGE OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, RESPONDENT
92 Fla. 354
Florida Supreme Court (1926)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 109 So. 427
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
The record in this case has been examined and all the material questions of law advanced in support of the motion for writ of prohibition have been discussed and disposed of in W. H. Stephenson v. National Bank of Winter Haven, decided this term. It therefore becomes unneces sary to discuss these questions here, so the writ of prohibition is dismissed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., concur. Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Martin v. United Sec. Servs., Inc., 314 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 1975)…la. 558, 106 So. 416 (1925). . Slaughter v. Cook, 195 So. 2d 6 (Fla.App.2d 1967), cert. den., 201 So. 2d 549 (Fla.1967). . Lithgow v. Hamilton, 69 So. 2d 776 (Fla.1954). . Duval v. Hunt, 34 Fla. 85, 15 So. 876 (1894); Triay v. Seals, 92 Fla. 310, 109 So. 427 (1926). . Duval v. Hunt, supra note 10. . Williams v. Ugree, 206 So. 2d 13 (Fla.App.2d 1968); Covey v. Eppes, 153 So. 2d 3 (Fla.1963). . Ellis v. Brown, 77 So. 2d 845 (Fla.1955) (adults); Hooper Const. Co., Inc. v. Drake, 73 So. 2d 279 (Fla.1954)…
-
J. Ray Arnold Lumber Corp. of Olustee v. Richardson, 105 Fla. 204 (Fla. 1932)…pleading prevailing in this State, and that the declaration in the instant case was sufficient under this rule to withstand the defendant’s demurrer and motions for compulsory amendment, which the lower court over-ruled. Triay v. Seals, 92 Fla. 310, 109 Sou. Rep. 427; Pillett v. Ershick, 99 Fla. 483, 126 Sou. Rep. 784; Dowling v. Nicholson, 101 Fla. 672, 135 Sou. Rep. 288. The evidence shows that the defendant owned and operated a sawmill and lumber manufacturing plant at Olustee. The defendant also owned and o…
-
Tampa Shipbuilding & Eng'g Corp. v. Adams, 132 Fla. 419 (Fla. 1938)…pleading prevailing in this State, and that the declaration in the instant case was sufficient under this rule to withstand the defendant’s demurrer and motions for compulsory amendment, which the lower court overruled. Triay v. Seals, 92 Fla. 310, 109 Sou. Rep. 427; Pillett v. Ershick, 99 Fla. 483, 126 Sou. Rep. 784; Dowling v. Nicholson, 101 Fla. 672, 135 Sou. Rep. 288.” Under Sections 5943 and 5944 C. G. L., and J. Ray Arnold Lumber Corp. v. Richardson, supra, we think the declaration states a cause of acti…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence