HERMAN BYRON BUTLER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Dual convictions for aggravated battery (enhanced by firearm use) and possession of a firearm during a felony arising from the same incident violate double jeopardy protections.
Herman Butler was convicted of aggravated battery with a firearm and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony for the same incident. …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Possession Of A Firearm During The Commission Of A Felony cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Herman Butler was convicted of aggravated battery by causing great bodily injury, the jury specifically finding that the battery was committed with a firearm. Consequently, Butler’s conviction was enhanced because of use of a firearm. Butler was also convicted of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony based on the same incident. Butler argues, and we agree, that these dual convictions constitute a double jeopardy violation. Therefore, we vacate Butler’s conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony.
A defendant cannot be convicted both of aggravated battery (enhanced because a firearm was used) and of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony based on the same incident. See State v. Brown, 633 So. 2d 1059 (Fla.1994). In the instant case, Butler received a life sentence for the aggravated battery conviction because he was found to be a violent'career criminal, pursuant to section 775.084(4), Florida Statutes (1997). Further, the judge suspended the sentence on Butler’s possession of a firearm conviction.
Thus, the dual convictions on aggravated battery and possession of a firearm did not serve to adversely impact Butler’s sentence. Butler was going to get life in prison based on the aggravated battery charge alone. That does not make the error of the dual convictions harmless, however. The error-a violation of Butler’s protection against double jeopardy-was fundamental error. See State v. Johnson, 483 So. 2d 420, 422-23 (Fla.1986). More over, even though the sentence on the possession conviction was suspended, the conviction itself stands and could potentially have an adverse impact on Butler in the future.
Therefore, the conviction must be vacated.
We find Butler’s other argument on appeal to be without merit. We hereby vacate Butler’s conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, but affirm Butler’s conviction and life sentence for aggravated battery.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Headley v. State, 90 So. 3d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…uch crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. . While the trial court suspended sentence as to the predicate offenses, Headley is correct in asserting that this does not cure the potential double jeopardy violation. See Butler v. State, 760 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).…
-
Grubb v. State, 940 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)…multiple victims, we note that those cases did not involve multiple [*1170] victims. Thus, any such language is, at best, dicta. We also reject the State’s argument that the double jeopardy violation constitutes harmless error. See Butler v. State, 760 So. 2d 151, 151-52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Because Grubb’s convictions for armed burglary of a dwelling and burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery constitute double jeopardy, we reverse. On remand, the trial court shall strike one of the two burglary…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Johnson, 483 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1986)
- State v. Brown, 633 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 1994)