JOSE ANTONIO CRUZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-06-28
No. 3D99-2611
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ.
760 So. 2d 1095 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The denial without hearing of the appellant’s 3.850 motion is reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing solely on the issue of defense counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to investigate and produce medical testimony concerning the extent of the victim’s injuries.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cruz v. State, 794 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
    …PER CURIAM. After the evidentiary hearing required by Cruz v. State, 760 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), on “the issue of defense counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to investigate and produce medical testimony concerning the extent of the victim’s injuries,” Cruz, 760 So. 2d at 1095, the trial court found that counsel had…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw