W. H. WADE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
A. L. COINERS, CAPTAIN OF STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision denying habeas corpus relief and ordered the discharge of W. H. Wade, who was imprisoned pursuant to a commitment issued by a deputy clerk without any record of conviction or sentence in the court's minutes. The case establishes that a commitment commanding imprisonment is void unless the court's minutes show the underlying judgment of conviction and sentence.
A commitment issued by a clerk of a court of record commanding the imprisonment of an accused is void unless there appears upon the minutes of such court the record of the judgment of conviction and sentence. The judgment of the Circuit Court denying habeas corpus relief was reversed and Wade was ordered discharged.
“All judgments of conviction or sentences are required to be entered in the minutes of the Court and a clerk of a court is not authorized to issue a comitment except when the minutes of the court show the record of a conviction and sentence of the accused.”
Establishes the fundamental legal requirement that commitments must be supported by recorded judgments in the court's minutes
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceW. H. Wade was committed to the St. Lucie County Jail for three months on May 3, 1926, for drunkenness as a second offense. The commitment was issued …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Per Curiam.
This cause comes to this Court on Writ of Error from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County remanding Plaintiff in Error, who was petitioner there, to the custody of the Defendant in Error upon hearing in Habeas Corpus. The return of the writ showed only that the petitioner was held by virtue of a commitment issued out of the County Court of St. Lucie County on the 3rd day of May, 1926. The commitment was in the following language: “IN COUNTY COURT, St. Lucie County, State of Florida. Nov. Term, A. D.
1925. Sentenced Dec. 7, A. D.
1925.
STATE OF FLORIDA) INDICTMENT FOR vs. ) Drunkeness W.
H. WADE ) Second Offense.
It is considered by the Court that you, W.
II. Wade, be taken by the sheriff, or his lawful Deputy, to the County Jail of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to be delivered to the keeper thereof, and there to be confined in the said County jail of said County, at hard labor for the period of three months from this date. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County Court of said County, this the 3rd day of May A. D. 1926. (Co. Ct. Seal)
P.
C. ELDRED, Clerk of the County Court.
By E.
L. PAYNE, D.
C.
Endorsed on the back thereof, was the following: IN COUNTY COURT, St. Lucie County State of Florida.
Commitment of: W.
H. WADE, To a period of 3 months, in the County Jail. Filed in the Clerk’s office St. Lucie County, Florida, This 15th day of May, 1926.
P. C. ELDRED, Clerk.
By E.
L. PAYNE, D. C.”
The return failed to show any basis for the issuing of the commitment. Upon hearing being had it was shown that the commitment was issued by a deputy clerk on the oral request of the prosecuting attorney. It is further shown by both the clerk of the county court and the deputy clerk that there was no record in the minutes of the county court of the .judgment of conviction or of sentence. It appears that there was no record of any order or judgment made by the •court. All judgments of conviction or sentences are required to be entered in the minutes of the Court and a clerk of 'a court is not authorized to issue a comitment except when the minutes of the court show the record of a conviction and sentence of the accused. A comitment issued by a Clerk of a Court of Record commanding the imprisonment of an accused is void unless there appears upon the minutes of such Court the record of the judgment of conviction and sentence in the cause. The judgment of the Circuit Court is revei’sed and the plaintiff in error is ordered discharged.
Reversed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the opinion,
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shargaa v. State, 102 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 1958)…. The appellant here insists that an “entered” judgment of conviction is essential to support a subsequent sentence. To sustain his position, he points to our opinions in Ellis v. State, 100 Fla. 27, 129 So. 106, 69 A.L.R. 783; and Wade v. Coniers, 92 Fla. 494, 109 So. 453. It is true that in the Ellis case we held that an adjudication of guilt will not on direct attack be implied from the mere imposition of sentence. In that case we also quoted from Section 49 of Freeman on Judgments, wherein it is state…