J. A. GILLIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
J. A. GILLIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
92 Fla. 533
Florida Supreme Court (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and' Bdford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ex Parte: George Sarros, 116 Fla. 86 (Fla. 1934)…valid, and that courts will not pass upon the constitutionality of a portion of an Act not before it. Harper v. Galloway, 58 Fla. 255, 51 So. 226, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 794, 19 Ann. Cas. 235; Lainhart v. Catts, 73 Fla. 735, 75 So. 47; Gwynn v. Hardee, 92 Fla. 533, 110 So. 343; Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co., 95 Fla. 530, 116 So. 449.” See also Sawyer et al., v. State, 100 Fla. 1603, 132 Sou. 188. The Relator relies on the opinion and judgment in the case of Spencer v. Hunt, 109 Fla. 248, 147 Sou. 282, to upho…