TIMOTHY OLIVER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT
TIMOTHY OLIVER, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT
761 So. 2d 487
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Ferguson v. State, 417 So. 2d 639 (Fla.1982); Cox v. State, 745 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Oliver v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)…ain, are an abuse of process.” Conception v. State, 944 So. 2d 1069, 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (citations omitted). The right to proceed pro se may be forfeited where it is determined, after proper notice and an opportunity to be 1 Oliver v. State, 761 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). 2 See Oliver v. State, 116 So. 3d 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013); Oliver v. State, 85 So. 3d 495 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Oliver v. State, 958 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Oliver v. State, 912 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Oliver v. State…
Authorities Cited
- Ferguson v. State, 417 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 1982)
- Brigham v. State, 745 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)