ANTHONY PARKS, APPELLANT,
v.
PROVENCE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLEE
ANTHONY PARKS, APPELLANT,
PROVENCE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLEE
761 So. 2d 1131
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 30 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing. Case No. 97-4287 was previously consolidated with Case No. 97-1320 by court order. We, therefore, substitute the following for the decision issued March 3, 1999 to correct the style of the case and to include the per curiam affirmance of Case # 97-4287.
AFFIRMED.
DELL, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (29 total)
-
Frederick W.J. Eggers v. Eggers, 776 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…rida Statutes. A motion to dismiss/transfer venue due to the impropriety of the plaintiffs venue selection is significantly different than a motion to transfer on forum non conveniens grounds. See PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP v. Cedar Resources, Inc., 761 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Improper venue can be waived if not timely raised. See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.140(b). Having failed to raise improper venue in his motion below, Frederick cannot raise the issue for the first time on appeal.1 See Spart…
-
McDANIEL Reserve Realty Holdings, LLC v. B.S.E. Consultants, Inc., 39 So. 3d 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…endry County but stayed its order pending this appeal. There are at least two different types of venue decisions a trial court may be asked to make, each requiring a different standard of review. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP v. Cedar Resources, Inc., 761 So. 2d 1131, 1188 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). When a trial court is presented with a motion to transfer venue based on the impropriety of the plaintiffs venue selection under section 47.011, the trial court must resolve any relevant factual disputes and then make a leg…
-
Am. Vehicle Ins. Co. v. Olive Goheagan, 35 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…in this context are reviewed to determine whether they are supported by competent, substantial evidence or whether they are clearly erroneous. The trial court’s legal conclusions are reviewed de novo.” PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP v. Cedar Res., Inc., 761 So. 2d 1131, 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (internal citations omitted). The plaintiff has the prerogative to choose the venue, and as long as that selection is proper as provided by statute, the court will not disturb the selection. Padin v. Travis, 990 So. 2d 1255…
Previewing 3 of 29 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence