ANTHONY PAYNE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2000-07-14
No. 1D99-4325
BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.
761 So. 2d 1251 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. State v. Woodley, 695 So. 2d 297 (Fla.1997); State v. Gray, 654 So. 2d 552 (Fla.1995).

BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Friedman v. Olsen, 805 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
    …ough the date of payment [of the purchase price], which shall be on or before [*980] April 24, 2000.”1 Arguing that the trial court had failed to properly follow the formula specified in the agreement, the Friedmans appealed. See Friedman v. Olsen, 761 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). This court concluded that the trial court had indeed erred in calculating the purchase price and accordingly reversed and remanded “for recalculation of the purchase price for the stock. In all other respects the final judgment i…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw