OPERADORA SERYNA, S.A. DE C.V., ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA-MEXICO, S.A., ETC., APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2000-07-28
No. 5D99-3633
PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
762 So. 2d 595 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Mandatory forum selection clauses, which include a waiver of other jurisdictions, are enforceable.


Facts & Procedural History

Banco Bilbao and Opera-dora entered into a contract with a forum selection clause specifying the Federal District of Mexico and waiving other jurisdic…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, J.

HARRIS, J.

Banco Bilbao filed this action in the Ninth Judicial Circuit based on a contract in which the parties thereto had submitted themselves “to the laws in force and the competent courts of the Federal District [of Mexico], waiving any other territorial jurisdiction that they may have.” Opera-dora moved to dismiss on the basis of the mandatory forum selection clause. The trial court found the forum selection clause to be only permissive and denied the motion. We reverse.

Although courts seem reluctant to construe forum selection clauses as mandatory1, it appears that if such construction cannot be avoided, mandatory forum selection agreements are within the power to contract protected by our constitution. See Manrique v. Fabbri, 493 So. 2d 437 (Fla.1986). Here, we cannot avoid the construction that a provision by which the parties agree to a specific forum and, at the same time, waive all other possible forums, is mandatory.

Banco Bilbao also urges that it has no other forum because the courts of the Federal District failed, when requested to do so, to “instruct the Judge of the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida, U.S.A., to stop the hearings on this case.” The Mexican court appears to have had before it an earlier agreement which selected Florida as the forum state for any dispute. In any event, we do not read the Mexican court’s order as denying Banco Bilbao a forum in the event Florida does not proceed with the litigation.

REVERSED.

PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur. . See Granados Quinones v. Swiss Bank Corp. (Overseas), S.A., 509 So. 2d 273 (Fla.1987), and Keaty v. Freeport Indonesia, Inc., 503 F. 2d 955 (5th Cir.1974).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • World Vacation Travel, S.A. v. Brooker, 799 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
    …use which submits parties to the laws in force and the competent courts of a specific forum and simultaneously waives any other territorial jurisdiction can only be deemed mandatory. See Operadora Seryna, S.A. de C.V. v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya-Mexico, 762 So. 2d 595, 595-6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). In interpreting a contract, All the various provisions of a contract must be so construed, if it can reasonably be done, as to give effect to each. Looking to the other provisions of a contract and to its general scope,…
  • Shoppes Ltd. P'ship v. Conn, 829 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …743 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“Any action ... arising out of this Agreement shall be initiated and prosecuted in the court of Shelby County, Tennessee, and nowhere else”); Operadora Seryna, S.A. de C.V. v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya — Mexico, S.A., 762 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (parties submitted themselves “to the ... courts of ... [Mexico], waiving any other territorial jurisdiction that they may have”). Paragraph 11, in providing that the “Guarantor hereby consents to the jurisdiction of the state a…
  • Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. Stearns Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 874 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
    …nce of a showing that the clause is unreasonable or unjust.”) (citing Management Computer Controls); see also Greenstreet Mgmt., Inc. v. Barker, 833 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Operadora Seryna, S.A. de C.V. v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya-Mexico, S.A., 762 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). “Mandatory jurisdiction clauses in contracts ... require that a particular forum be the exclusive jurisdiction for litigation concerning the contract. ...” Shoppes Ltd., 829 So. 2d at 357-58. “As a general principle, a trial cou…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw