FABIAN SOSA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH (A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA), AND THE CITY OF WEST PALM CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Fabian Sosa appealed the dismissal of his third amended complaint under the Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act, claiming the City of West Palm Beach unlawfully burdened his property by refusing to issue permits for remodeling. The court affirmed dismissal because Sosa failed to comply with statutory prerequisites for bringing a Harris Act claim.
Sosa failed to comply with the Harris Act's prerequisites for suit. Specifically, he did not present a bona fide, valid appraisal to support his claim, and he presented his claim fewer than 180 days before filing suit, both of which are mandatory under the statute.
[1] A property owner must present a claim in writing to the head of the governmental entity and submit a bona fide, valid appraisal supporting the claim at least 180 days pri…
[2] Failure to comply with the statutory prerequisites for bringing a claim under the Bert J. …
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“When a specific action of a governmental entity has inordinately burdened an existing use of real property or a vested right to a specific use of real property, the property owner of that real property is entitled to relief, which may include compensation for the actual loss to the fair market value of the real property caused by the action of government, as provided in this section.”
Establishes the substantive standard for Harris Act claims
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn February 1997, the City issued a condemnation notice for a structure Sosa was remodeling, citing severe deterioration and code violations. Over twe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act cases and more on FLexlaw
POLEN, J.
Fabian Sosa appeals after the trial court dismissed with prejudice his third amended complaint, brought under the -Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act (“Harris Act”), against the City of West Palm Beach (“City”). We affirm.
On February 21, 1997, the City issued a notice and order of condemnation with respect to a structure that Sosa was remodeling on. certain real property that' he owned. The notice and order indicated that' inspection of the structure revealed severe deterioration and multiple code violations, and that the costs to repair the problems would exceed the estimated value of the structure. The forms indicated that the structure was deemed to be unsafe for human habitation and, thus, a public nuisance.
Over 'the next twenty months, Sosa appeared before the City’s Board of Adjustment and Appeals several times. Despite extensions given to him by the City to obtain the proper certifications and permits, Sosa failed to do so. On September 23, 1998, the Board found that Sosa continued to perform work on the property without proper permits and certifications and that the public safety concerns with respect to the soundness of the structure still existed. Accordingly, demolition of the -structure was ordered.
Sosa next brought a petition for certiorari in the circuit court, but that was dismissed as untimely filed. He then sued the City, alleging various violations of the Harris Act. He alleged that the City placed an inordinate and/or substantial burden on his property by purposely refusing to issue the required permits that Sosa needed to properly complete remodeling of the structure. He alleged that the City’s action rose to the level of a taking.
On the City’s motion, the court dismissed the third amended complaint with prejudice. It found, among other reasons, that Sosa failed to comply with the prereq uisites for bringing a Harris Act claim. This appeal followed.
The Harris Act, codified in section 70.001, Florida Statutes (1997), creates a distinct and independent cause of action for aggrieved property owners. § 70.001(1), (5)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). The Act provides,
When a specific action of a governmental entity has inordinately burdened an existing use of real property or a vested right to a specific use of real property, the property owner of that real property is entitled to relief, which may include compensation for the actual loss to the fair market value of the real property caused by the action of government, as provided in this section.
§ 70.001(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). The: Act, however, requires that
[n]ot less than 180 days prior to filing an action under this section against a governmental entity, a property owner ... must present the claim in writing to the head of the governmental entity. The property owner must submit, along with the claim, a bona fide, valid appraisal that supports the claim and demonstrates the loss in fair market value to the real property....
§ 70.001(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997).
In this vein, our review of the record supports that Sosa failed to comply with the prerequisites for bringing suit under the Harris Act. Not only did he fail to present to the City any appraisal supporting the claim prior to bringing suit, he presented his claim less than 180 days before he filed this action. Thus, we affirm dismissal, of the third amended complaint.
AFFIRMED.
STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wendler v. City OF ST. Augustine, 108 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…ceiving the ripeness decision, the property owner may file an action for damages. § 70.001(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). Failure to comply with these procedural requirements will result in a dismissal of the lawsuit. See Sosa v. City of West Palm Beach, 762 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that complaint must be dismissed where property owner failed to comply with prerequisites for bringing suit under Harris Act). Provided that the procedural requirements of the Harris Act are satisfied, the court then det…
-
City OF Jacksonville v. Coffield, 18 So. 3d 589 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…d 320, 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (Act does not bar a private property rights claim against a government agency pursuant to the Act, but does preserve the sovereign immunity that governmental enti- . ties otherwise enjoy); Sosa v. City of W. Palm Beach, 762 So. 2d 981, 982 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (dismissal of claimant’s complaint affirmed because claimant failed to comply with prerequisites of Act). . The Fourth District has held that possession even of a building permit does not necessarily create a vested propert…
-
Dhbh Atl. L.L.C. v. City of Delray Beach, 334 So. 3d 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)…93, 494– 95 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). If the party seeking relief fails to present an appropriate appraisal supporting its claim within the statutory timeframe, the trial court may dismiss the claim with prejudice. See Sosa v. City of West Palm Beach, 762 So. 2d 981, 981–82 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). “The party seeking relief under the Harris Act bears the burden of proof” that an action taken by a government entity has inordinately burdened either an existing use or a vested right of use of real property. Ocean Co…