ANTHONY A. STUART, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ANTHONY A. STUART, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
763 So. 2d 319
Florida Supreme Court (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Stuart v. State, No. 98-02900 (Fla. 2d ’DCA June 2, 1999), which cited Leonard v. State, 731 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), quashed, 760 So. 2d 114 (Fla.2000), as controlling authority. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1981). As in Leonard, the State has conceded that the sentences imposed in this case are illegal because they exceed the statutory maximum for the offense. Therefore, we quash the district court’s decision in this case and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla.2000).
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stuart v. State, 869 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…solved. SALCINES AND KELLY, JJ„ Concur. . Stuart has three prior appeals related to the present consolidated appeals. See Stuart v. State, 771 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Stuart v. State, 765 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); and Stuart v. State, 763 So. 2d 319 (Fla.2000).…
Authorities Cited
- Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000)
- Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2000)
- Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)
- Leonard v. State, 731 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)