MELISSA NEAL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Sami Qubty v. Rasiklal Nagda, 817 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
  …nded, third party beneficiary to sue under a contract is recognized only if the parties clearly express, or the contract itself expresses, an intent to primarily and directly benefit the third party. Jim Macon Bldg. Contractors, Inc. v. Lake County, 763 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Id. Qubty concedes that the contract involved here does not designate him to be a third party beneficiary of the contract. He nonetheless contends he has a right to enforce the arbitration agreement under principles of agency.…
• Hirshenson v. Spaccio, 800 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …nded, third party beneficiary to sue under a contract is recognized only if the parties clearly express, or the contract itself expresses, an intent to primarily and directly benefit the third party. Jim Macon Bldg. Contractors, Inc. v. Lake County, 763 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). The JWC agreement specifically provides in pertinent part that: The undersigned agrees that the undersign’s broker is a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, and that the terms and conditions hereof, including the arbitra…
• In re A.S., 909 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …e granted. It is well established that the work of a trial court is not completed by a non-final order that dismisses a petition or complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend. See, e.g., Jim Macon Building Contractors, Inc. v. Lake County, 763 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Klein v. Pinellas County, 685 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Augustin v. Blount, Inc., 573 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see also Carlton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 621 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Accordingly, the August 12…

Authorities Cited

• Archer v. Adm'r, Fla. State Hosp., 622 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)