COASTAL PHYSICIAN SERVICES OF BROWARD COUNTY, INC. AND HEALTHCARE BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC., PETITIONERS,
v.
CARMEN ORTIZ, RESPONDENT
WARNER, J.
The petitioner, on motion for rehearing, again objects to our failure to limit the discovery request to Florida residents, allowing the respondent to pursue discovery related to non-Florida recipients of the offending billing notices. The petitioner claims that since non-Florida residents cannot make claims under either the Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, sections 501.201-.213, Florida Statutes (1997), or the Consumer Collection Practices Act, sections 559.55-.785, Florida Statutes (1997), discovery should not be allowed regarding out-of-state billings. Having reviewed the statutory provisions, we conclude that these acts are for the protection of in-state consumers from either in-state or out-of-state debt collectors. See, e.g., § 501.202(3); § 559.55(6). Other states can protect their own residents, as Florida itself does with regard to out-of-state collectors. See, e.g., § 559.565.
We therefore grant the petition for certiorari to the extent that it requests discovery of billing notices sent to the residents of other states.
POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Millennium Commc'ns & Fulfillment v. Off. of the Attorney Gen., 761 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…, 219 (Fla.1984) (“courts of this state are without power to construe an unambiguous statute in a way which would extend, modify, or limit, its express terms ...”). Millennium cites us to Coastal Physician Services of Broward County, Inc. v. Ortiz, 764 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) wherein the fourth district granted a petition for certiorari in an action brought pursuant to FDUTPA and the Consumer Collection Practices Act, §§ 559.55-785, Fla. Stat. (1997), and quashed a discovery order, in part, to limit t…
-
Hutson v. Rexall Sundown, Inc., 837 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…Communications & Fulfillment, Inc. v. Office of the Attorney General, 761 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), in support of their argument that Renaissance superseded this court’s decision in Coastal Physician Services of Broward County, Inc. v. Ortiz, 764 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We disagree. In Coastal, this court addressed a discovery issue as it applied to a class action for violation of FDUPTA and the Consumer Protection Act. On rehearing, this court limited discovery to Florida residents and stated…
-
Schauer v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. & Morse Operations, 819 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…Collection Practices Act claim against GMAC. The Act seeks in part to protect in-state consumers from the illegal and/or unscrupulous practices of debt collectors [*812] and other persons.1 Coastal Physician Svcs. of Broward, County, Inc. v. Ortiz, 764 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)(on reh’g); § 559.72, Fla. - Stat. (1999). Section 559.55(6), Florida Statutes .(1999), one of the sections comprising the Act, defines “debt collector” as one who “attempts to collect ... debts owed or ... due another.” The statu…