KENNETH LAMAR LURRY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KENNETH LAMAR LURRY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
764 So. 2d 618
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Blakley v. State, 746 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
WARNER, C.J., DELL, and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Padgett v. State, 780 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…onflicting testimony was presented. The record reflects no abuse of discretion in the court’s rejecting Padgett’s version of the events and concluding that there was no coercion. See Stephens v. State, 748 So. 2d 1028 (Fla.1999); Schmidt v. State, 764 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Padgett further asserts that the trial court erred when it failed to inform him of the maximum penalty for the offenses to which he pled guilty. Clearly, the trial court is required to determine on the record that the defend…
Authorities Cited
- Blakley v. State, 746 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)