HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., FORMER SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PETITIONER,

v.

ROBERT BRONSON, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Grabau v. Dep't of Health, 816 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …that, once established, the psychologist-client relationship is deemed to continue in perpetuity for the purpose of determining the existence of sexual misconduct was rejected on the authority of the recent decision in Caddy v. Department of Health, 764 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (holding that rule deeming psychologist-client relationship to continue in perpetuity, in context of prohibition against sexual relationships between psychologist and client, was not least intrusive means of defending State’s com…
• Gibson v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 828 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …en v. Wainwright, 307 So. 2d 258, 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). See Diggs v. Dep’t of Con., 503 So. 2d 412, 413 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) ("[W]e conclude that petitioner's sentence has expired, and we therefore grant the writ.”). See also Singletary v. Bronson, 764 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). . According to DOC’s records, at the time of his release from incarceration, he had 21 days of jail credit, and 1,660 days of actual prison time served; and 1,969 days of gain-time had accrued, for a total of 3,650 days (10 yea…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Thomas v. Smith, 882 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …t infringes on the. right to privacy will be invalidated unless it can survive the compelling state interest test. See Von Eiff v. Azicri, 720 So. 2d 510, 514 (Fla.1998); In re T.W., 551 So. 2d 1186, 1192 (Fla.1989); Caddy v. State, Dep’t of Health, 764 So. 2d 625, 629-30 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The Supreme Court of Florida has recently reaffirmed the applicability of the compelling state interest test to the determination of questions arising under Florida’s right of privacy. N. Fla. Women’s Health & Counseling…